why LinkedBlockingQueue#poll(int, TimeUnit) is hanging up?
Vitaly Davidovich
vitalyd at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 01:43:42 UTC 2012
Symptoms here are eerily similar to
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6822370, hence I'm curious if it
still repros with -XX:+UseMembar.
Sent from my phone
On Sep 10, 2012 8:45 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> This kind of issue is better discussed, at least initially on Doug Lea's
> concurrency interest list: concurrency-interest at cs.**oswego.edu<concurrency-interest at cs.oswego.edu>
>
> The stack shows that it is the lock acquisition that is blocking
> indefinitely, not the poll itself. That is why it doesn't time out and why
> it hangs again immediately after you interrupt the thread.
>
> You need to see what is happening to other threads using this LBQ and
> whether one of them holds the lock and is itself "stuck" somewhere. You
> also need to see if there are any asynchronous exceptions involved
> (Thread.stop use, or StackOverflowException) as these can corrupt the
> internal state of an AbstractQueuedSynchronizer like ReentrantLock.
>
> David
>
> On 11/09/2012 4:00 AM, Iris Clark wrote:
>
>> Forwarding to core-libs-dev.
>>
>> iris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yegor Bugayenko [mailto:egor at technoparkcorp.**com<egor at technoparkcorp.com>
>> ]
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 5:52 AM
>> To: jdk7-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: why LinkedBlockingQueue#poll(int, TimeUnit) is hanging up?
>>
>> I already posted the question here:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/12349881<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12349881>
>>
>> Could one of you guys take a look? Thanks!
>>
>> -
>> Yegor
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list