Suggestion to improve profile/package in javadoc

[Paul Benedict]

I was looking at b85 javadocs, and saw this at the page's top for a class:

compact1, compact2, compact3
java.lang

I don't think it's clear what is being shown. I understand it -- but I am
following the feature closely. I recommend prefixing the data because the
package is no longer the sole item:

Profiles: compact1, compact2, compact3
Package: java.lang

Paul