RFR(XS) : JDK-8008687 - MethodHandle code: allow static and invokespecial calls to interface methods
Bharadwaj Yadavalli
bharadwaj.yadavalli at oracle.com
Wed Apr 24 01:26:05 UTC 2013
On 4/22/2013 2:06 PM, John Rose wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bharadwaj Yadavalli <bharadwaj.yadavalli at oracle.com> wrote:
>> I would like to request for a review of code changes made to support lambda related modifications to allow static and invokespecial calls to interface methods per spec version 0.6.2 (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlsmith/jsr335-0.6.2.html). These changes support an upcoming change that compiles lambdas as private static methods in conjunction with hotspot changes pushed to address JDK-8006267.
> Looks good as far as it goes (to allow private lambda bodies to be accessed from interfaces). But more work is needed to align the java.lang.invoke APIs with the new class file rules.
>
> In your code, I think the case 'refKind == REF_invokeSpecial' is missing. The draft JVMS implies REF_invokeSpecial is also allowed, since an interface method can be any of {public,private}+{static,non-static}.
Thanks for pointing it out. I modified the assertion in
referenceKindIsConsistent() to allow REF_invokeSpecial to reference
interface method. I have uploaded the modified webrev. Please review.
JBS : https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8008687
Original Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bharadwaj/8008687/webrev_0/
Modified Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bharadwaj/8008687/webrev_1/
Reran lambda tests successfully.
> We should have unit tests for findStatic and findSpecial of interface methods. (Also unreflect and unreflectSpecial.)
>
> But it is a step forward. You can count me as a reviewer. Please consider filing a followup bug to support the other new interface method kinds.
I have filed a new JBS issue.
Thanks again.
Bharadwaj
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list