[Fwd: Missing merge for 8014890: Reference queues may return more entries than expected]

[Alan Bateman]

Mandy is just back from vacation and might not have got to your mail 
yet. However it's not clear to me that there is an actual problem as it 
looks like you've just ended up with two heads, maybe a hg fetch when 
you had changes where you forgot to merge? As I understand, the hg 
server is setup to limit the heads to 1 so it's not possible for any of 
us to push changes that would result in a new head. Maybe start with a 
fresh clone of jdk8/tl or jdk8/jdk8?

-Alan.


On 14/08/2013 10:19, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>    could somebody take care of the missing merge for the fix below?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> From: Thomas Schatzl<thomas.schatzl at oracle.com>
>> To: mandy.chung at oracle.com
>> Subject: Missing merge for 8014890: Reference queues may return more
>> entries than expected
>> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:47:30 +0200
>>
>> Hi Mandy,
>>
>>    while checking out latest sources, I saw that the commit for that
>> patch has not been merged to the default branch in the repository. It
>> represents its own head.
>>
>> Could you fix this?
>>
>> Here's the relevant hg output:
>>
>> $ hg heads
>> changeset:   7764:8ed8e2b4b90e
>> tag:         tip
>> parent:      7763:0741b19835b0
>> parent:      7692:b52a2ecdb803
>> user:        lana
>> date:        Tue Aug 06 10:10:39 2013 -0700
>> summary:     Merge
>>
>> changeset:   7605:2c04ce2f782c
>> user:        mchung
>> date:        Mon Jul 08 14:05:59 2013 +0200
>> summary:     8014890: (ref) Reference queues may return more entries
>> than expected
>>
>