RFR: JDK 9: 8024033: [launcher] remove solaris dual mode support
Kumar Srinivasan
kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com
Wed Dec 11 21:12:46 UTC 2013
On 12/11/2013 12:25 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Although I have a small emotional attachment to the idea of fat
> binaries, there doesn't seem to be too much support for this in the
> larger java community, and probably the larger unix community will be
> 64-bit only relatively soon. So ... OK.
>
> There's one remaining mention of "LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32". Maybe you want
> to scrub that as well?
> 589 (void)UnsetEnv((wanted == 32) ? "LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32" : "LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64");
>
Good catch I will scrub that.
Thanks Martin.
Kumar
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Kumar Srinivasan
> <kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com <mailto:kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Joe, Martin, et. al.,
>
> In JDK8, solaris 32-bit support was removed entirely, this is the
> only platform that required
> dual-mode support, ie. 32-bit and 64-bit binaries co-located in
> the same binary hierarchy
> on the disk. In JDK 8 the DUAL_MODE support was disabled in the
> launcher, using compile
> time conditionals, however in JDK9 we wish to remove the logic
> entirely, this is messy and
> makes the launcher cleaner and easier to maintain.
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8024033/webrev.0/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eksrini/8024033/webrev.0/>
>
> Thanks
> Kumar
>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list