Review request for 8009115: jtreg tests under jdk/test/javax/script should use nashorn as script engine

[A. Sundararajan]

Thanks Alan. Yes, nashorn is a "js" engine as well and so user's java 
code can use getEngineByName("js") and get it. The current change is to 
make sure that javax.script tests use nashorn engine - rather than any 
other "js" engine that may be present in the underlying jdk.

-Sundar

On Wednesday 27 February 2013 04:47 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 27/02/2013 10:44, A. Sundararajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8009115/
>>
>> Changing javax.script tests to use nashorn engine explicitly. 
>> Adjusted tests for differences b/w nashorn and rhino engines.
>> Changes documented here: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8009115/README
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Sundar
> These changes look okay to me although I assumed that Nashorn would be 
> a "js" scripting engine, in which case there shouldn't be a need to 
> change many of the getEngineByName("js") usages to "nashorn".
>
> -Alan