Improving performance and reducing object allocations of java.util.UUID to/from string
Mike Duigou
mike.duigou at oracle.com
Thu Jan 10 19:02:24 UTC 2013
I apologize for the lack of reply. I had missed this thread while on holiday.
As Aleksey suggests the first step is to complete the OCA/CLA.
Until that step is complete we won't be able to act upon this contribution in any formal way. I encourage you to update the patch with any specific feedback you receive.
Thanks in advance for this contribution!
Mike
On Jan 9 2013, at 09:51 , Steven Schlansker wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I sent this email a week ago and have received no replies. Is there any step I have missed necessary to contribute to the JDK libraries?
>
> I am very interested in making your lives easier, so please let me know if I am in the wrong place or are otherwise misguided.
>
> Thanks!
> Steven
>
>
> On Dec 29, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello core-libs-dev,
>>
>> My company uses UUIDs throughout our software. We recently identified that the java.util.UUID implementations of fromString and toString are horridly inefficient.
>>
>> An incomplete list of the inefficiencies:
>>
>> * fromString uses a regular expression that is not even precompiled
>> * fromString uses a regular expression to parse out the "-" markers, requiring the allocation of many String and String[] objects, when a simple linear scan works just fine
>> * fromString unnecessarily allocates multiple Long objects
>>
>> * toString creates a char[64], a String object which copies that, and a sub-String object for *each* of the 5 hex digit segments
>> * toString produces a fixed-length result but involves multiple StringBuilder concatenations
>>
>> Everyone that I have shown the relevant code to has been horrified by the complete lack of care towards object allocations. While I am a big fan of the "object allocation is free until otherwise proven" philosophy, we traced multiple production problems down to these hotspots.
>>
>> But instead of just whining about it, I wish to contribute a patch which I believe fixes the problem. This is my first attempt to submit anything to the JDK, so please be nice :-)
>>
>> My initial attempt has yielded micro benchmarks with very favorable outcomes. By taking the appropriate code from java.lang.Long, modifying it to work on a single pre-allocated array+offset rather than returning a String, and scanning for dashes instead of regex splitting I reduced times 3-6x and object allocations to the low single digits.
>>
>> My Google Caliper benchmark is available here, to ensure that I have not committed any benchmark sins:
>> https://gist.github.com/4356621
>>
>> benchmark instances Bytes ns linear runtime
>> JdkUuidFromString 51.00 1544.0 608.2 ==============================
>> NewUuidFromString 2.00 72.0 179.1 ========
>>
>> JdkUuidToString 31.00 1720.0 321.4 ===============
>> NewUuidToString 3.00 200.0 51.5 ==
>>
>> In particular, the reduction of object allocations from ~1.5KB to 72/200 bytes dramatically reduces GC pressure when you sit in a tight loop deserializing millions of UUIDs from strings.
>>
>> I believe the same patch can (and should?) apply to jdk7u and jdk8, as the code does not seem to have changed.
>>
>> I would appreciate any feedback on the code style, efficiency, or correctness that you can offer. I have run the "java/util/UUID" jtreg suite against this and it passes. We stole the more thorough Apache Harmony tests for this and they pass as well: https://github.com/stevenschlansker/components-ness-core/blob/master/src/test/java/com/nesscomputing/uuid/TestNessUUID.java
>>
>> I have not yet secured a CLA, but my company is in the process of signing one.
>>
>> The rest of the message is a "hg export" of my change set, which is current to the tip of jdk7.
>> Happy holidays, and thank you for your time!
>> Steven Schlansker
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Steven Schlansker <steven at nesscomputing.com>
>> # Date 1356737383 0
>> # Node ID a812c963b96f08112f6805cbc380b12af196f788
>> # Parent 9b8c96f96a0f9a5801b55530a387fefbe50482a3
>> java.util.UUID: improve performance of UUID#toString and UUID#fromString by avoiding many unnecessary object allocations.
>>
>> benchmark instances Bytes ns linear runtime
>> JdkUuidFromString 51.00 1544.0 608.2 ==============================
>> NewUuidFromString 2.00 72.0 179.1 ========
>>
>> JdkUuidToString 31.00 1720.0 321.4 ===============
>> NewUuidToString 3.00 200.0 51.5 ==
>>
>> diff -r 9b8c96f96a0f -r a812c963b96f src/share/classes/java/util/UUID.java
>> --- a/src/share/classes/java/util/UUID.java Mon Jun 27 13:21:34 2011 -0700
>> +++ b/src/share/classes/java/util/UUID.java Fri Dec 28 23:29:43 2012 +0000
>> @@ -189,26 +189,79 @@
>> * described in {@link #toString}
>> *
>> */
>> - public static UUID fromString(String name) {
>> - String[] components = name.split("-");
>> - if (components.length != 5)
>> - throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid UUID string: "+name);
>> - for (int i=0; i<5; i++)
>> - components[i] = "0x"+components[i];
>> + public static UUID fromString(String str) {
>> + int dashCount = 4;
>> + int [] dashPos = new int [6];
>> + dashPos[0] = -1;
>> + dashPos[5] = str.length();
>>
>> - long mostSigBits = Long.decode(components[0]).longValue();
>> + for (int i = str.length()-1; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + if (str.charAt(i) == '-') {
>> + if (dashCount == 0) {
>> + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid UUID string: " + str);
>> + }
>> + dashPos[dashCount--] = i;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (dashCount > 0) {
>> + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid UUID string: " + str);
>> + }
>> +
>> + long mostSigBits = decode(str, dashPos, 0) & 0xffffffffL;
>> mostSigBits <<= 16;
>> - mostSigBits |= Long.decode(components[1]).longValue();
>> + mostSigBits |= decode(str, dashPos, 1) & 0xffffL;
>> mostSigBits <<= 16;
>> - mostSigBits |= Long.decode(components[2]).longValue();
>> + mostSigBits |= decode(str, dashPos, 2) & 0xffff);
>>
>> - long leastSigBits = Long.decode(components[3]).longValue();
>> + long leastSigBits = decode(str, dashPos, 3) & 0xffffL;
>> leastSigBits <<= 48;
>> - leastSigBits |= Long.decode(components[4]).longValue();
>> + leastSigBits |= decode(str, dashPos, 4) & 0xffffffffffffL;
>>
>> return new UUID(mostSigBits, leastSigBits);
>> }
>>
>> + private static long decode(final String str, final int [] dashPos, final int field) {
>> + int start = dashPos[field]+1;
>> + int end = dashPos[field+1];
>> + if (start >= end) {
>> + throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid UUID string: " + str);
>> + }
>> + long curr = 0;
>> + for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
>> + int x = getNibbleFromChar(str.charAt(i));
>> + curr <<= 4;
>> + if (curr < 0) {
>> + throw new NumberFormatException("long overflow");
>> + }
>> + curr |= x;
>> + }
>> + return curr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + private static final int NUM_ALPHA_DIFF = 'A' - '9' - 1;
>> + private static final int LOWER_UPPER_DIFF = 'a' - 'A';
>> +
>> + private static int getNibbleFromChar(final char c)
>> + {
>> + int x = c - '0';
>> + if (x > 9) {
>> + x -= NUM_ALPHA_DIFF; // difference between '9' and 'A'
>> + if (x > 15) {
>> + x -= LOWER_UPPER_DIFF; // difference between 'a' and 'A'
>> + }
>> + if (x < 10) {
>> + throw new IllegalArgumentException(c + " is not a valid character for an UUID string");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (x < 0 || x > 15) {
>> + throw new IllegalArgumentException(c + " is not a valid character for an UUID string");
>> + }
>> +
>> + return x;
>> + }
>> +
>> // Field Accessor Methods
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -372,19 +425,46 @@
>> * @return A string representation of this {@code UUID}
>> */
>> public String toString() {
>> - return (digits(mostSigBits >> 32, 8) + "-" +
>> - digits(mostSigBits >> 16, 4) + "-" +
>> - digits(mostSigBits, 4) + "-" +
>> - digits(leastSigBits >> 48, 4) + "-" +
>> - digits(leastSigBits, 12));
>> + return toString(getMostSignificantBits(), getLeastSignificantBits());
>> }
>>
>> - /** Returns val represented by the specified number of hex digits. */
>> - private static String digits(long val, int digits) {
>> - long hi = 1L << (digits * 4);
>> - return Long.toHexString(hi | (val & (hi - 1))).substring(1);
>> + public static String toString(long msb, long lsb) {
>> + char[] uuidChars = new char[36];
>> +
>> + hexDigits(uuidChars, 0, 8, msb >> 32);
>> + uuidChars[8] = '-';
>> + hexDigits(uuidChars, 9, 4, msb >> 16);
>> + uuidChars[13] = '-';
>> + hexDigits(uuidChars, 14, 4, msb);
>> + uuidChars[18] = '-';
>> + hexDigits(uuidChars, 19, 4, lsb >> 48);
>> + uuidChars[23] = '-';
>> + hexDigits(uuidChars, 24, 12, lsb);
>> +
>> + return new String(uuidChars);
>> }
>>
>> + private static void hexDigits(char[] dest, int offset, int digits, long val) {
>> + long hi = 1L << (digits * 4);
>> + toUnsignedString(dest, offset, digits, hi | (val & (hi - 1)), 4);
>> + }
>> +
>> + private final static char[] HEX_DIGITS = {
>> + '0' , '1' , '2' , '3' , '4' , '5' ,
>> + '6' , '7' , '8' , '9' , 'a' , 'b' ,
>> + 'c' , 'd' , 'e' , 'f'
>> + };
>> +
>> + private static void toUnsignedString(char[] dest, int offset, int len, long i, int shift) {
>> + int charPos = len;
>> + int radix = 1 << shift;
>> + long mask = radix - 1;
>> + do {
>> + dest[offset + --charPos] = HEX_DIGITS[(int)(i & mask)];
>> + i >>>= shift;
>> + } while (i != 0 && charPos > 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> /**
>> * Returns a hash code for this {@code UUID}.
>> *
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list