class SplittableRandom

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Jul 15 23:31:08 UTC 2013


On 07/15/13 19:06, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Another experiment that provides bit-full seed but poor gamma

Keeping in mind that we won't support the seed+gamma constructor,
For what value of K would you be content to know that
the generators associated with the first K splits for
any SplittableRandom pass DieHarder, with, in the aggregate,
no more than the statistically expected false alarms
stemming from the fact that RNG quality tests are themselves
statistical?

-Doug





More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list