Java 8 RFR 8020539: Clean up doclint problems in java.util package, part 2

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at
Thu Jul 18 05:07:14 UTC 2013


In, I would prefer if the <font> size manipulation of the 
exponent was removed instead of

373      * All 2<fontstyle="font-size:smaller;"><sup>24</sup></font> 
possible {@code float} values


373      * All 2<sup>24</sup> possible {@code float} values.

Also, I think the changes in Scanner would be better of the JLS-style 
grammar syntax was used, which is what is done in places like 
java.lang.*. From memory,

     First Option of the production
     Second Options of the production

Offhand, I wasn't aware Dequeue and Queue were maintained in Doug's CVS, 
but I agree changes to those files should flow through there first.



On 07/17/2013 02:23 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> Will do so once what has been posted is approved.
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> and are primarily maintained in Doug's CVS and should be updated there.  Please remove them from this change.
>> Doug and I will work on cleaning up doclint warnings in CVS.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list