Java 8 RFR 8020539: Clean up doclint problems in java.util package, part 2

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at
Thu Jul 18 18:50:16 UTC 2013

On 07/18/2013 11:16 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> In, I would prefer if the <font> size manipulation of the 
>> exponent was removed instead of
>> 373      * All 2<fontstyle="font-size:smaller;"><sup>24</sup></font> 
>> possible {@code float} values
>> just
>> 373      * All 2<sup>24</sup> possible {@code float} values.
> I previously made that change and must have inadvertently reverted it. 
> Thanks for the catch.
>> Also, I think the changes in Scanner would be better of the JLS-style 
>> grammar syntax was used, which is what is done in places like 
>> java.lang.*. From memory,
>> NonTerminal:
>>    First Option of the production
>>    Second Options of the production
> This I interpret to mean the second example in the first block in this 
> section 

Right (although the on-line rendering in the browser I'm using while 
typing this doesn't look very clear in distinguishing the terminals and 

I've used this notation for grammars in java.lang.Integer and 

>> Offhand, I wasn't aware Dequeue and Queue were maintained in Doug's 
>> CVS, but I agree changes to those files should flow through there first.
> I shall remove them from the patch.
> Thanks,
> Brian



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list