RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow

Louis Wasserman lowasser at google.com
Mon Jun 17 18:37:13 UTC 2013


You're right, it'd be WIDTH - 1, but since most of the comments refer to
BITS + 1, that evens out nicely.


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian Burkhalter <
brian.burkhalter at oracle.com> wrote:

> Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit?
>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote:
>
> > The comments mention SIGNIFICAND_BITS, which I think should probably be
> SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH?
>
>


-- 
Louis Wasserman



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list