RFR 8017540: Improve multi-threaded contention behavior of BigInteger.toString() radix conversion cache
Peter Levart
peter.levart at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 21:21:54 UTC 2013
On 06/25/2013 10:54 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Trying to improve this yields the code very similar to
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-June/018368.html,
> although not as effective on slow path:
>
> private static final BigInteger[][] powerCache;
>
> BigInteger getRadixConversionCache(int radix, int exponent) {
> BigInteger retVal = null;
> BigInteger[][] pc = powerCache;
> BigInteger[] cacheLine = pc[radix];
> int oldSize = cacheLine.length;
> if (exponent >= oldSize) {
> cacheLine = Arrays.copyOf(cacheLine, exponent + 1);
> }
> retVal = cacheLine[exponent];
> if (retVal == null) {
> retVal = BigInteger.valueOf(radix);
> for (int i = 0; i < exponent + 1; i++) {
> cacheLine[i] = retVal;
> retVal = retVal.square();
> }
> pc[radix] = cacheLine;
> }
> return retVal;
> }
>
> -Aleksey.
I think this is correct from logical standpoint. But not very effective.
Think of single-threaded usage first. You resize for every exponent that
is bigger than biggest requested so-far. And each time you request
exponent that is bigger or equal to the biggest requested so far, you
recalculate all squares (the last one calculated is not stored!!!).
I think it pays back if you search backwards from requested exponent to
the biggest non-null slot, and only recalculate those that are not
calculated yet. The search, although linear, is nothing compared to the
recalculation of the same number of slots that were searched-back.
Regards, Peter
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list