RFR: 8009428 and 8009429 - Profile related fixes and clean ups
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Mar 8 01:48:35 UTC 2013
Not sure which is best list for this given Alan will likely be the only
reviewer anyway :)
Webrevs under:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8009428_8009429/
Two related sets of fixes here:
JDK-8009428: Revert changes to $ substitution performed as part of
nashorn integration
This removes the special $ handling in ListPathSafely in MakeBase.gmk;
and reverts the change in file names in CreateJars.gmk so that \$$ is
restored to \$$$$
---
JDK-8009429 Miscellaneous profiles cleanup
Miscellaneous cleanups to the Profiles.gmk file and the include lists:
- ensure all lists are expanded in case they contain wildcards
Previously I only expanded lists I knew to be (or have been non-empty).
- use wildcards to list related classes
Avoid listing explicit classes, particularly if nested classes are involved.
- remove redundant subpackage entries if all subpackages are in the same
profile
The original list was generated from a list of all packages and
subpackages and contained a lot of redundancy. If profile_1 for example
contains java/lang then it implicitly contains java/lang/ref,
java/lang/reflect etc, and doesn't need them listed. If a particular
subpackage is not part of profile_1, say java/lang/special is in the
full JRE only, then we need only list java/lang/special as an included
package for the full JRE. All included packages for the full JRE and
higher numbered profiles become excluded packages for the lower numbered
profiles hence profile_1 would be "everything in java/lang except
java/lang/special".
(Things are a little more complicated when the subpackage exists in the
lower numbered profiles. In that case the higher-level has to list out
the included subpackages explicitly together with included classes.)
- rename things so that the full JRE is not referred to as "PROFILE_4"
The Full JRE is not a compact profile. While we logically treated it as
a fourth profile for build purposes this is potentially confusing and so
we no longer do that. A JRE may be a full JRE or it may be a Compact
Profile JRE.
Plus in CreateJars.gmk:
- cleanup the de-beaning actions
Now we've got a better understanding of the way $ gets processed I
figured out how to express this the "natural" way.
---
Thanks,
David
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list