Add getChars to CharSequence

[David Holmes]

On 21/05/2013 3:55 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> This is __the__ fundamental question of whether to add
> CharSequence.getChars at all.
>
> If none of the objects in the jdk can trust any of the others, they will
> spend all of their time making defensive copies and unmodifiable wrappers.

But you are not limiting this to objects in the jdk! The CharSequence 
could come from anywhere. If the CharSequence is actually a 
String/StringBuffer/StringBuilder then use the optimization. But 
otherwise you are just violating encapsulation.

David
-----

> This is the reverse side of whether you can trust any collection class to
> not retain a pointer to the array returned by toArray.
>
> Alternatively, we could add a security check to every use of getChars, but
> that gets in the way of the performance we're trying to achieve here.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:22 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I took a look at this in relation to the other StringBuffer bugs.
>>
>> I have a concern. Looking at this:
>>
>> @@ -453,12 +438,11 @@
>>       public AbstractStringBuilder append(CharSequence s) {
>>           if (s == null)
>>               return appendNull();
>> -        if (s instanceof String)
>> -            return this.append((String)s);
>> -        if (s instanceof AbstractStringBuilder)
>> -            return this.append((**AbstractStringBuilder)s);
>> -
>> -        return this.append(s, 0, s.length());
>> +        int len = s.length();
>> +        ensureCapacityInternal(count + len);
>> +        s.getChars(0, len, value, count);
>> +        count += len;
>> +        return this;
>>       }
>>
>> it seems that you are passing the ABS internal char[] value, directly to
>> an external method (s.getChars) which could be overridden to do whatever it
>> wants to the passed in array! Am I missing something?
>>
>> David
>> -----
>>
>>
>> On 11/04/2013 10:40 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>
>>> I've often wished that CharSequence had getChars methods, as many of the
>>> concrete implementations already do.
>>> In jdk8 with default methods, this is possible!
>>> This will make some of the String code a little nicer and more efficient.
>>>
>>> Here's a preliminary patch in this direction, that overlaps with some of
>>> the work done in
>>>
>>> 6206780: (str) Forwarding append methods in String{Buffer,Builder} are
>>> inconsistent
>>> Summary: update StringBuilder & StringBuffer to consistently handle
>>> forwarding to AbstractStringBuilder. Some additional cleanup (removal of
>>> refs to sub-classes from AbstractStringBuilder)
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**martin/webrevs/openjdk8/**getChars/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk8/getChars/>
>>>
>>> If we have consensus that this is a good idea, I can flesh this out.
>>>
>>>