RFR(2): 7174936: several String methods claim to always create new String
Lance Andersen - Oracle
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
Tue Nov 12 17:14:15 UTC 2013
The wording changes seem fine to me.
Thanks for the specdiff as it made it much easier to review
On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's an updated version of the String spec change. Changes from the previous version address comments made by Brent Christian and David Holmes. Specifically:
>
> - Specify copyValueOf() overloads as "equivalent to" corresponding valueOf() overloads.
> - Remove extranous changes to subSequence() method
> - Clarify wording of concat() method doc.
>
> Bug report:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7174936
>
> Webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7174936/webrev.1/
>
> Specdiff:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7174936/specdiff.1/overview-summary.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> s'marks
>
> On 11/7/13 2:31 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please review the following spec changes to java.lang.String.
>>
>> In several places the specs mention returning "new" strings. This is
>> overspecified; it's sufficient to return "a" string that satisfies the required
>> properties. In some cases the current implementation doesn't create a new string
>> -- for example, substring(0) returns 'this' -- which is strictly a violation of
>> the spec. The solution is to relax the spec requirement to create new strings.
>>
>> Also, this change cleans up the specs for the copyValueOf() overloads to make
>> them identical to the corresponding valueOf() overloads. Previously, they were
>> gratuitously different. I think that some time in the dim, distant past,
>> probably before JDK 1.0, they had different semantics, but now they're
>> identical. The specs should say they're identical.
>>
>> This change is spec only, no code changes.
>>
>> Bug report:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/jdk-7174936
>>
>> Webrev:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7174936/webrev.0/
>>
>> Specdiff:
>>
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7174936/specdiff.0/overview-summary.html
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> s'marks
-------------- next part --------------
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list