Review request for JDK-8021398: j.l.r.Parameter.getAnnotatedType().getType() for not annotated use of type returns null
Eric McCorkle
eric.mccorkle at oracle.com
Tue Oct 1 20:31:42 UTC 2013
I am already running pre-commit tests, but I have another upcoming
reflection API patch, and I could do this as part of that one.
On 10/01/13 15:36, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> If it is not too late you could also change other references to "new TypeAnnotation[0]" in the same source file.
>
> 78 TypeAnnotation[] typeAnnotations = l.toArray(new TypeAnnotation[0]);
> 79 return AnnotatedTypeFactory.buildAnnotatedType(type,
> 80 LocationInfo.BASE_LOCATION,
> 81 typeAnnotations,
> 82 typeAnnotations,
> 83 decl);
>
> and
>
> 279 res[i] = AnnotatedTypeFactory.buildAnnotatedType(bounds[i],
> 280 loc,
> 281 l.toArray(new TypeAnnotation[0]),
> 282 candidates.toArray(new TypeAnnotation[0]),
> 283 (AnnotatedElement)decl);
> 284 }
>
> Paul.
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Eric McCorkle <eric.mccorkle at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> I forgot to hg add the test. I've addressed your and others' comments,
>> and refreshed the webrev. Please review.
>>
>> On 10/01/13 04:06, Joel Borggren-Franck wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Thanks for fixing this.
>>>
>>> On 2013-10-01, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>>> Hello, please review this simple patch which fixes a problem in the type
>>>> annotations handling API. This manifests as a problem with both
>>>> j.l.r.Parameter.getAnnotatedType().getType() as well as
>>>> j.l.r.Executable.getAnnotatedParameterTypes().getType().
>>>>
>>>> The webrev is here:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8021398/
>>>>
>>>> The bug report is here:
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021398
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fix looks mostly fine, but please use the shared array on line 47
>>> instead of allocating a new one.
>>>
>>> Also you lack a test, adopt the test from the bug and add it to
>>> jdk/test/java/lang/annotations/typeAnnotations/
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> /Joel
>>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list