RFC 6910473: BigInteger negative bit length, value range, and future prospects

[Brian Burkhalter]

I would expect as much, but that's an exercise I'd prefer to avoid at this time if the content does not appear likely to be acceptable.

Thanks,

Brian

On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Joseph Darcy wrote:

> Without comments on the contents of the patch, a change in documented behavior would require a ccc request.