RFR: 8024014 & 8024015 : (xs) TEST.groups updates

[Alan Bateman]

On 03/09/2013 00:23, David Holmes wrote:
> On 3/09/2013 2:05 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 30/08/2013 21:30, Mike Duigou wrote:
>>> :
>>> Did you see David Holmes' suggestion? Do you think it's adequate? I
>>> agree about the maintainability aspect as I really felt guilty
>>> re-creating FILES_JAVA.gmk...
>> Sorry Mike, I somehow missed your reply on this topic. Do you mean
>> reorganizing the tests, say to move the collection tests down a level? I
>
> I think he meant my suggesting on how to define the groups without 
> needing to list everything that comprises "other".
>
That form of composition is fine, it's defining the contents of 
jdk_collections that I'm concerned about.

-Alan