RFR: 8024014 : (xs) TEST.groups updates

Chris Hegarty chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Wed Sep 4 10:48:03 UTC 2013


On 04/09/2013 00:23, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> Here is an updated webrev of just 8024014:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8024014/0/webrev/

I'm ok with this, and as someone who runs these test frequently I am 
looking forward to being able to quickly run the different groups.

> The controversial item here is the definition of the jdk_collections group which, since collections isn't aligned to a directory, is defined by a list of sub-directories. Since the list of files is quite static and would not have changed since Java 6 (except for jdk_stream) I think we should be able to tolerate the not-too-long list of files for the jdk_collections category.

Not part of this change, but it would be nice to have a script (checked 
in ) that could parse the groups and report directories/tests that are 
not captured by any group, to easily identify future test additions.

-Chris.

>
> Other opinions?
>
> Mike
>
> On Aug 29 2013, at 17:13 , Mike Duigou wrote:
>
>> Hello all;
>>
>> This is a review for two changesets. The first change (JDK-8024014) splits up the jdk_util test group a bit by introducing three sub-groups, jdk_collections, jdk_stream and jdk_concurrent. The main advantage is that it's easier/quicker to test individual components. The intent is that the test groups are aligned with bug database sub-components.
>>
>> The second change moves some important lambda related tests from languishing in obscurity in the jdk_other group to the jdk_lang group to reflect their importance and relation to other tests. These tests are contained in the jdk/lambda directory.
>>
>> The combined webrev is here:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8024015/0/webrev/
>>
>> The effect of these changes won't be visible to most people until JDK-8015068 is integrated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list