SplittableRandom update
Doug Lea
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Sep 20 23:14:02 UTC 2013
On 09/20/2013 11:36 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi Kasper,
>
> Can you please log a bug [1] (and also note that ThreadLocal/Random does the same) ?
>
> My preference would be to get this code in and fix the error reporting separately.
>
Even though a minor nuisance, I agree; it would be a simple
practice bug for us (especially me!) to get used to the
newly-externally-accessible bug system.
-Doug
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Kasper Nielsen <kasperni at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is minor, but I hate it when bounds check does not include the
>> specified parameters.
>> Makes it much harder to track down a bug, if all you have is a stack trace.
>>
>> - Kasper
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In the course of writing up a report (coming soon) that includes
>>> discussion of SplittableRandom, we had a chance to further
>>> analyze and test things, resulting in a few small improvements. Plus
>>> some internal renamings to better reflect intent.
>>> Plus now with the same initial seed mechanics
>>> discussed a few days ago for ThreadLocalRandom.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Paul Sandoz for creating webrevs:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/**browse/JDK-8025136<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025136>
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-**
>>> enhancements/webrev/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/tl/JDK-8025136-SR-enhancements/webrev/>
>>>
>>> I think we need one more reviewer for it.
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list