Summary of 1st week was: ReferenceQueue.remove to allow GC of the queue itself
Jaroslav Tulach
jaroslav.tulach at oracle.com
Fri Aug 1 05:15:57 UTC 2014
Dear all.
On Fri Jul 25, 2014:
> So, let’s start with the problem, rather than the solution. Could you start
> with writing up what issue you’re trying to address, and then we can
> proceed to evaluating whether the proposed solution is the right one?
Thanks for the encouragement, thanks for your comments, suggestions and ideas. I
believe it is time to provide more permanent (than an email) summary of what we
discussed so far. I've added such comment to the JIRA:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843?focusedCommentId=13531670&p
age=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#comment-13531670[1]
Please let me know if I am misinterpreting something. JIRA comment is editable, so I
should be able to fix it.
I hope we continue our discussions and come up with even better ways to address the
activeReferenceQueue cleanup problem!
-jt
> On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tulach at oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I'd like to add one new method into java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue. Can
> > anyone help me go through the review process? I've reported
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843
> > but that probably is not enough, right?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your help.
> > -jt
--------
[1]
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843?focusedCommentId=13531670&p
age=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#comment-13531670
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list