Summary of 1st week was: ReferenceQueue.remove to allow GC of the queue itself

Jaroslav Tulach jaroslav.tulach at oracle.com
Fri Aug 1 05:15:57 UTC 2014


Dear all.

On Fri Jul 25, 2014:
> So, let’s start with the problem, rather than the solution.  Could you start
> with writing up what issue you’re trying to address, and then we can
> proceed to evaluating whether the proposed solution is the right one?

Thanks for the encouragement, thanks for your comments, suggestions and ideas. I 
believe it is time to provide more permanent (than an email) summary of what we 
discussed so far. I've added such comment to the JIRA:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843?focusedCommentId=13531670&p
age=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#comment-13531670[1] 

Please let me know if I am misinterpreting something. JIRA comment is editable, so I 
should be able to fix it.

I hope we continue our discussions and come up with even better ways to address the 
activeReferenceQueue cleanup problem!
-jt


> On Jul 24, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tulach at oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I'd like to add one new method into java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue. Can
> > anyone help me go through the review process? I've reported
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843
> > but that probably is not enough, right?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your help.
> > -jt


--------
[1] 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051843?focusedCommentId=13531670&p
age=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel#comment-13531670



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list