RFR: [8054714] Use StringJoiner where it makes the code cleaner
Claes Redestad
claes.redestad at oracle.com
Sat Aug 9 00:44:26 UTC 2014
Looks good to me, if that matters...
Not sure if worth considering, but for simple cases like
src/share/classes/java/util/PropertyPermission.java, you could return
the possible constant values instead:
static String getActions(int mask) {
switch (mask & 0x3) {
case 1:
return SecurityConstants.READ;
case 2:
return SecurityConstants.WRITE;
case 3:
return SecurityConstants.RW;
default:
return "";
}
}
Also, now that it's backed by a String[], some of these cases could be
optimized if StringJoiner had a way to set/ensure capacity (what leaky
abstractions?).
Thanks!
/Claes
On 2014-08-08 23:26, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> This is a follower of the recently fixed [8051382] -- Optimize
> java.lang.reflect.Modifier.toString().
>
> I found a dozen+ other places in jdk, where using the StringJoiner
> makes the code shorter and cleaner.
>
> Would you please help review the fix?
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8054714/0/webrev/
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Ivan
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list