RFR: JDK-8029007, Check src/share/native/sun/misc code for JNI pending exceptions
Mike Duigou
mike.duigou at oracle.com
Fri Jan 10 18:21:03 UTC 2014
On Jan 10 2014, at 10:09 , Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2014, at 18:05, Dan Xu <dan.xu at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> My macro is a little different from yours, which compares with -1 instead of NULL. I also see CHECK_EXCEPTION macro. Thanks for adding them, which are useful when I cannot decide the pending exception state by just using return values.
>>
>> As for the style, actually I prefer the (!pointer) to (pointer == NULL) because it is more concise and also make me avoid the typo like (pointer = NULL), which I cannot find from the compilation. Thanks!
There's always "yoda conditions" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoda_conditions, (NULL == pointer), but that's not likely to make anyone (besides me) happy.
Mike
>
> Not that it matters, but my preference is to == NULL.
>
> -Chris.
>
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>>
>> On 01/10/2014 08:40 AM, roger riggs wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Just pushed are macros in jni_util.h to do the same function as your new macros.
>>> Please update to use the common macros instead of introducing new ones.
>>>
>>> Style wise, I would avoid mixing binary operators (!) with pointers.
>>> it is clearer to compare with NULL. (The CHECK_NULL macro will do the check and return).
>>>
>>> (Not a Reviewer)
>>>
>>> Thanks, Roger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2014 1:31 AM, Dan Xu wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Please review the fix for JNI pending exception issues reported in jdk-8029007. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dxu/8029007/webrev.00/
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029007
>>>>
>>>> -Dan
>>>
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list