Long valueOf instead of new Long

[Pavel Rappo]

As per [1] I'm updating this thread with yet another webrev:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.05

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-July/027487.html

-Pavel

On 30 Jun 2014, at 13:04, Pavel Rappo <pavel.rappo at oracle.com> wrote:

> If a test run finishes fine, I'll push this version (no Unsafe*LongFieldFieldAccessorImpl.java files included):
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.04/
> 
> -Pavel
> 
> On 30 Jun 2014, at 11:31, Andrej Golovnin <andrej.golovnin at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Pavel,
>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeQualifiedLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeQualifiedStaticLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.03/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/UnsafeStaticLongFieldAccessorImpl.java.sdiff.html
>> 
>> Please don't change the UnsafeXXXFieldAccessorImpl classes.
>> This classes should be changed as a part of the fix of the issue 5043030.
>> The patch for this issue has been already submitted, see here:
>> 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-June/027311.html
>> 
>> When Joel is back, he will continue to work on it.
>> 
>> Otherwise it looks good to me.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Andrej Golovnin
>