Long valueOf instead of new Long
Pavel Rappo
pavel.rappo at oracle.com
Fri Jun 27 10:00:52 UTC 2014
I created an issue to track the progress and also made 2 webrevs. One for the original patch and one for the changes that have been suggested earlier in this thread by Paul and Andrej. Here we go:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048267
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.00
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8048267/webrev.01
-Pavel
On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:58, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
> Otavio,
>
> I skimmed over the patches and they look ok to me. I think they would be suitable for inclusion in jdk9/dev.
>
> -Chris.
>
> P.S. I do not currently have time to sponsor this, but I cc’ed Pavel who may be able to help get his in.
>
> On 14 Jun 2014, at 14:46, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <otaviojava at java.net> wrote:
>
>> Reason: The Long class has cache and using it, will save memory and will
>> faster than using create new instance of Long.
>>
>> webrev:
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16109193/open_jdk/long_value_of.zip
>>
>> similar: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044461
>> --
>> Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
>>
>> blog: http://otaviosantana.blogspot.com.br/
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava
>> site: http://www.otaviojava.com.br
>> (11) 98255-3513
>> <sun_tools.diff><sun_security.diff><sun_nio.diff><sun_management.diff><sun_jvmstat.diff><javax_swing.diff><javax-management.diff><java_text.diff><java_awt_image.diff><internal_org_objectweb.diff><com_sun_tools.diff><com_sun_security.diff><com_sun_jmx_snmp.diff><com_sun_jdni_ldap.diff><com_sun_imageio.diff>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list