RFR [7011804] SequenceInputStream with lots of empty substreams can cause StackOverflowError

Ivan Gerasimov ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
Sun Mar 2 11:13:43 UTC 2014


Thank you Alan!

On 02.03.2014 14:50, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 07:58, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> SequenceInputStream#read functions are implemented recursively.
>> This may cause stack overflow in some extreme cases with lots of 
>> empty substreams.
>>
>> Would you please help review the fix?
>>
>> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/7011804
>> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/7011804/0/webrev/
> Thanks for taking one. I don't think this code has changed much since 
> JDK 1.0 where it seems to have been originally implemented to use 
> recursion. I'm dubious about the bug report and whether the usage is 
> real or made-up to demonstrate the issue.
>
It might also be easier for VM to optimize non-recursive code, if there 
is such a need.


> In any case, the changes good to me. One comment in passing is that 
> normally an InputStream read throws IOException when the stream is 
> closed where as SIS returns EOF. There may be an opportunity to 
> clarify the javadoc in a few places (not for this bug of course).
>
> The test looks okay. I agree with Chris that there shouldn't be a need 
> to run it in its own VM.
>
Ok. I'll remove it.

Sincerely yours,
Ivan


> -Alan.
>
>
>




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list