RFR [8014066] Mistake in documentation of ArrayList#removeRange
Doug Lea
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Mar 14 12:22:07 UTC 2014
On 03/14/2014 08:07 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> So what you are saying is that protected overrides of protected methods are not
> required to honor the specification of the super method?
Not always, but ...
>
> That certainly gives some implementation flexibility, but I don't think I've
> ever seen it expressed as a rule.
>
... this is the convention for @implSpecs for default methods on interfaces.
Which probably would have been used here instead of AbstractList had
they existed back in JDK1.2.
-Doug
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list