RFR: JDK-8033662 DateTimeFormatter parsing ignores withZone()

[Xueming Shen]

Hi Stephen,

Given the fact that the parser context is no longer public, the parsed from the
formatter is either unresolved or resolved, just wonder if we really need those
"effective" chrono and zone fields in Parsed. It appears perfect for me to simply
keep these info inside the parser context and return the unresolved and resolved
based on the formatter's request, for example

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8033662/webrev2/

-Sherman

On 03/20/2014 11:24 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Hi there,
> It would be great if I could get a review please.
>
> The patch is viewable in plain text at JIRA (for IP reasons):
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/attachment/19216/ParseWithZone.patch
>
> The same patch is viewable in a nice format at GitHub
> https://gist.github.com/jodastephen/9505761
>
> This really needs to make 8u20 IMO, so I need to get it into jdk9 first
> thanks
> Stephen
>
>
>
> On 12 March 2014 12:29, Stephen Colebourne<scolebourne at joda.org>  wrote:
>> This is a request for review of this bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033662
>> and the duplicate:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8033659
>>
>> The javadoc of the method java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter::withZone says:
>> "If no zone has been parsed, then this override zone will be included
>> in the result of the parse where it can be used to build instants and
>> date-times."
>> However, the implementation doesn't obey this.
>>
>> This is a very unfortunate bug that makes some date-time parsing a lot harder.
>>
>> A second related bug in an egde case - not properly handling a
>> ChronoZonedDateTime from TemporalField.resolve - is also tested for
>> and fixed.
>>
>>
>> Proposed patch:
>> https://gist.github.com/jodastephen/9505761
>> The patch includes no spec changes.
>> The patch includes new and refactored TCK tests. The new tests for
>> withZone() and withChronology() are based on the spec.
>>
>> I need a reviewer and a committer please.
>> thanks