RFR: 8062771: Core reflection should use final fields whenever possible
Joel Borggrén-Franck
joel.franck at oracle.com
Thu Nov 13 13:55:18 UTC 2014
Hi Martin,
Since you have already provided us with the patch here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk8/Class-thread-safety/
Lets do it the other way around. I think this is a very good fix for 8u,
reviewed.
I'll start the backporting approval with you as the provider of the fix
and me as reviewer.
cheers
/Joel
On 2014-11-07, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks for volunteering. I foisted all I have in
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064391
>
> I volunteer to be your reviewer for the backports.
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Joel Borggrén-Franck
> <joel.franck at oracle.com> wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> >
> > On 6 nov 2014, at 20:51, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Joel,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Joel Borggrén-Franck
> >> <joel.franck at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I’m having a hard time following this thread, which webrev has been updated, for which release, fixing which issue?
> >>
> >> I am submitting the changeset for JDK-8062771, adding the finals and
> >> the (failed reproduction) test.
> >> Hopefully there will be followon changes to add even more thread safety.
> >>
> >
> > Great.
> >
> > Are we sure the accidental fix of making ClassRepository volatile is good on all platforms? I can’t establish the happens before relations that would prove the fix but then again I’m not an expert on concurrency.
> >
> >>> Martin, as far as I can see you are the only one of us who has replied to this thread who is a jdk7u committer (or reviewer).
> >>
> >> I am entirely in favor of having more reviewers.
> >>
> >> We are not planning to push these into jdk7u or jdk8u ourselves, but
> >> we are willing to help anyone who wants to take on that task. Joel,
> >> are you volunteering?
> >> We believe all versions of stock openjdk still have (rarely seen)
> >> thread safety issues in core reflection. We have applied changes
> >> locally at Google to fix those.
> >>
> >
> > I’ll take care of 8u, and I can hunt down someone to fix this in 7u if we can find a suitable reviewer (sigh).
> >
> > cheers
> > /Joel
> >
> >
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list