Lower overhead String encoding/decoding

[Remi Forax]

On 11/15/2014 07:07 PM, Richard Warburton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
[...]

>
> A good observation. I've added variants which take a String for the charset
> name as well the charset variants.
>
> Having said that - wouldn't it also be a good idea to replicate the caching
> on the charset versions as well as the charset name? I don't see any
> obvious reason why this isn't possible but perhaps there's something I'm
> missing here. Probably cleaner as a separate patch either way.
>
> regards,

I think it will create a security hazard, if a rogue charset declare 
itself as UTF-8 and create a malicious charset decoder, you don't want 
this decoder to be shared and reused.

Rémi

>
>    Richard Warburton
>
>    http://insightfullogic.com
>    @RichardWarburto <http://twitter.com/richardwarburto>