[9, 8u40] RFR (XXS): 8059880: Get rid of LambdaForm interpretation

[Vladimir Ivanov]

Thanks, Vladimir!

Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov

On 11/19/14, 9:20 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> As far as I can guess :) this change looks good. Reviewed.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 11/19/14 2:24 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> Aleksey, Duncan, thanks for the review and the confirmation that it
>> doesn't break stuff for you.
>>
>> Any Reviews, please? :-)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>
>> On 11/19/14, 2:23 PM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management) wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2014 23:33, "Aleksey Shipilev" <aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 11/19/2014 12:01 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059880/webrev.00/
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059880
>>>>
>>>> Yes, for the love of God, GO FOR IT.
>>>
>>> Seconded. Startup of our stuff seems fine now with a compile
>>> threshold of
>>> zero, and it will make stacks so much easier to read in the debugger.
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev