Losing features of JVM_Open, e.g. CLOEXEC

[David Holmes]

On 30/10/2014 6:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 29/10/2014 21:15, Mario Torre wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> We should have spotted it in the review though.
>>
>
> We should but the ultimate rat catcher should be the tests, it's
> possible that we have a hole there.

Not sure how the presence or absence of CLOEXEC would be visible to any 
test - especially given all the other uses of raw open in the JDK sources.

David