RFR: 8078139 : jdk.xml.dom should be loaded by the ext class loader

[Sean Mullan]

On 04/21/2015 01:36 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Good point.  They are all interfaces that don't require any permission.

Ah, ok. Never mind then.

> I'm inclined to suggest the client, e.g. implementation classes,
> requiring jdk.xml.dom should configure proper permissions for itself as
> well as permissions required by jdk.xml.dom.

Yes, but that would require editing the policy file on systems which may 
not be under your control.

--Sean

> Otherwise it would require
> AllPermissions.

>
> Mandy
>
> On 04/21/2015 10:26 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Do we also need to change the java.policy file to grant specific
>> permissions to the jdk.xml.dom module?
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>> On 04/21/2015 01:19 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
>>> Thanks Mandy, Alan.
>>>
>>> Fixed the issues. Here's the updated webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8078139/webrev/
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>> On 4/21/2015 10:10 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> On 21/04/2015 17:54, huizhe wang wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> By JDK-8042244, we moved several org.w3c.dom packages to a module
>>>>> called jdk.xml.dom. This new module shall be loaded by the ext class
>>>>> loader.  Please review the patch for the change.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8078139/webrev/
>>>> Looks okay. I assume @test is not needed in this test because it's a
>>>> TestNG tree, is that right?
>>>>
>>>> -Alan
>>>
>