RFR: 5108778 Too many instances of java.lang.Boolean created in Java application(core-libs)

[Sebastian Sickelmann]

Hi,

i wanted to start a discussion/review-process for JDK5108778 some
time ago. Please see a previous try below. The patches are now pretty
old, and I will rebase and update them to the created sub-issues

- JDK-8143008 (jaxp)
- JDK-8143009 (jaxws)
- JDK-8143010 (corba)

for a sub-repo-discussion/review/push-process after initial discussion
has started.

For now the webrev for the initial discussion i would love to use

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxp/webrev.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxws/webrev.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/corba/webrev.00/


--
Sebastian

On 10/27/2015 05:32 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Actually I am searching through the JBS for low hanging fruits.
> Right now i am looking through the openjdk-sources and try to evaluate
> if i can make something about JDK-5108778.
>
> Please find my webrevs for the jaxp, jaxws and corba repos at:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxp/webrev.00/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxws/webrev.00/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/corba/webrev.00/
>
> I hope for jaxp,jaxws and corba this mailinglist is also the right place.
> 8
> jaxp:
> For the change in XBoolean (jaxp) i thought it would be more readable
> than the autoboxing solution.
>
> jaxws:
> The changes in jaxws are in a generated class. I would love to fix this
> in the source, but i have no clue where the real source could be.
>
> corba:
> For all calls against
> com.sun.tools.corba.se.idl.constExpr.Expression.value(Object) i used the
> valueOf solution instead of the autoboxing for better readability.
>
> -- Sebastian