General question: sun package -> jdk package?

Paul Benedict pbenedict at apache.org
Tue Dec 15 19:51:53 UTC 2015


I only asked out of curiosity. There seemed to be a migration trend, but I
didn't know what the intent was. I understand a name is just a name, but I
personally do like seeing the vestiges of "sun" being replaced with
something more universal.

Cheers,
Paul

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:

> 2015/12/15 7:09 -0800, Paul Benedict <pbenedict at apache.org>:
> > I have a general question prompted by the many classes moved from sun.*
> to
> > jdk.*. Once JDK 9 delivers on the Module System and internals are no
> longer
> > exposed, is it planned to eventually migrate away from the sun.* legacy
> > namespace in later JDK versions?
>
> There's no specific intent right now to remove or rename all the
> existing internal sun.* packages in any particular timeframe.
>
> For a while now new JDK-specific packages, internal or otherwise,
> have been named jdk.* rather than {sun,com.sun}.*, and we intend
> to continue that practice going forward.
>
> Why do you ask?
>
> - Mark
>



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list