Logging FileHandler: static locks and hardcoded maximum number
Behrooz Nobakht
nobeh5 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 14:29:27 UTC 2015
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for referring to this ticket.
Here is what I did.
My Java version:
java version "1.8.0_40-ea"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_40-ea-b21)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.40-b24, mixed mode)
So, to make this more observable.
The p1 process invokes a command with p2: start and stop.
So, with 50 pairs of start and stop, we should be able to see the problem
again.
I ran a script that invokes start from p1, gets the status of p2, stops p2
and confirms its status again.
Here's the output from run 49:
===
run 49
Invoking Start
RUNNING
Invoking Stop
STOPPED
run 49 - Done
run 50
Invoking Start
RUNNING
Invoking Stop
STOPPED
run 50 - Done
run 51
Invoking Start
RUNNING
Invoking Stop
RUNNING
run 51 - Done
run 52
Invoking Start
STOPPED
Invoking Stop
STOPPED
run 52 - Done
run 53
Invoking Start
STOPPED
Invoking Stop
STOPPED
run 53 - Done
run 54
Invoking Start
STOPPED
Invoking Stop
STOPPED
run 54 - Done
===
As the above shows, starting run 51, the expected status is violated.
And, here is what I get a lsof of the log directory on the application:
===
-rw-rw-r-- 1 appuser appuser 0 Feb 19 15:19 app.stdouterr.100.0.log.lck
-rw-rw-r-- 1 appuser appuser 3.0K Feb 19 15:19 app.stdouterr.100.0.log
-rw-rw-r-- 1 appuser appuser 0 Feb 19 15:16 app.stdouterr.0.0.log.lck
-rw-rw-r-- 1 appuser appuser 366 Feb 19 15:16 app.stdouterr.0.0.log
===
Thanks for your time on this,
Behrooz
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Behrooz,
>
> On 19/02/15 13:46, Behrooz Nobakht wrote:
>
>> The version of Java is irrelevant. We have tested our setup
>> on Java 7 and Java 8 u25/31. We observe the same exception.
>>
>>
> Ok - then the version is indeed relevant ;-)
>
> What you are observing may be a symptom of
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048020
> which was fixed in 8u40 build 6.
>
> If you would like to verify that this bug is indeed
> what is causing your issue, you may want to try out
> your setup with an early access build of 8u40, and
> see if the problem disappears.
>
> Early access of 8u40 may be downloaded from there:
> https://jdk8.java.net/download.html
>
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
--
-- Behrooz Nobakht
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list