[8u-dev] Review request : JDK-8062904: TEST_BUG: Tests java/lang/invoke/LFCaching fail when run with -Xcomp option

Konstantin Shefov konstantin.shefov at oracle.com
Mon Jun 1 16:22:30 UTC 2015


Hi Vladmir

It seems we have only this bug that manifests the problem. As I 
understand, this is a product issue, not test.

-Konstantin

On 29.05.2015 14:49, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> What do you mean by ignore code cache overflow? Do you mean I should fix
>> the test to ignore these errors or should I leave this test unfixed
>> because it is a product related issue?
> The former. How reliable the test is if it ignores 
> NoSuchMethodException & VirtualMachineError? Are there other 
> manifestations of the problem?
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
>
>> On 28.05.2015 21:22, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>> Got it, thanks.
>>>
>>> Can we ignore errors caused by code cache overflow for now?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>
>>> On 5/28/15 12:03 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>
>>>> This fix is not for timeout issue, this fix is for
>>>> "java.lang.VirtualMachineError: out of space in CodeCache for 
>>>> adapters".
>>>>
>>>> Timeout issue is other bug and should be filed separately.
>>>> I do not know why SQE added RULES with timeout to this bug.
>>>>
>>>> By the way, if -Xcomp is set on JDK 8u, test works if not more than 
>>>> one
>>>> iteration is allowed. The same thing was for JDK 9 until 
>>>> JDK-8046809 had
>>>> been fixed.
>>>>
>>>> -Konstantin
>>>>
>>>> On 27.05.2015 19:54, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>>>>> Have you tried to reduce iteration granularity?
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably, checking execution duration on every test case is more
>>>>> robust.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Vladimir Ivanov
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/27/15 5:50 PM, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review the test bug fix
>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062904
>>>>>> Webrev is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8062904/webrev.01/
>>>>>> Test fails only against JDK 8u and passes against JDK 9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Konstantin
>>>>
>>




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list