Unsafe.{get,put}-X-Unaligned; Efficient array comparison intrinsics
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 08:45:45 UTC 2015
On 05/03/15 01:01, David Holmes wrote:
> I'm only glancing at parts of this ...
>
> On 5/03/2015 6:21 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> John's suggestion works well; the code is smaller and neater.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/unaligned.jdk.3/
>
> This doesn't make sense to me:
>
> 929 // The byte ordering of this machine
> 930 public final static boolean LITTLE_ENDIAN = false;
> 931 public final static boolean BIG_ENDIAN = true;
>
> as they won't necessarily represent "this" machine! And the usage:
>
> ! private static final ByteOrder byteOrder
> ! = unsafe.getByteOrder() == Unsafe.LITTLE_ENDIAN ?
> ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN : ByteOrder.BIG_ENDIAN;
>
> suggests getByteorder() is really isBigEndian() (which the hotspot part
> confirms) - so then the two constants can be removed completely:
>
> private static final ByteOrder byteOrder
> = unsafe.isBigEndian() ? ByteOrder.BIG_ENDIAN :
> ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN;
Indeed, I was thinking of giving that method a better name. Works for me.
Andrew.
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list