RFR 9: 8132394 : (process) ProcessBuilder support for a pipeline of processes
Roger Riggs
Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Thu Nov 12 14:50:11 UTC 2015
Hi Paul,
On 11/12/2015 9:45 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> One more thing i forgot to mention, if there is ever a chance that
> ProcessBuilder is changed from final to non-final we should List<?
> extends ProcessBuilder>.
I don't see that happening.
If so would the change from List<ProcessBuilder> to List<? extends
ProcessBuilder>
should be source and binary compatible. And therefore could be made at
the same time (and not now).
Roger
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list