RFR 9: 8132394 : (process) ProcessBuilder support for a pipeline of processes

Roger Riggs Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Thu Nov 12 14:50:11 UTC 2015


Hi Paul,


On 11/12/2015 9:45 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> One more thing i forgot to mention, if there is ever a chance that 
> ProcessBuilder is changed from final to non-final we should List<? 
> extends ProcessBuilder>.
I don't see that happening.

If so would the change from List<ProcessBuilder> to List<? extends 
ProcessBuilder>
should be source and binary compatible. And therefore could be made at 
the same time (and not now).

Roger





More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list