RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 2

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Nov 23 15:47:46 UTC 2015


On 11/23/2015 10:27 AM, Peter Levart wrote:

> Sorry for confusion. I now noticed that Throwable.addSuppressed() and
> getSuppressed() methods are actually synchronized! I don't know how I missed that...
>

And I don't know how you led me to forget that :-)

> So above patch is not needed. Even printing uses getSuppressed() that returns a
> snapshot. So the only thing remaining is the behavior that exceptions can change
> while they are being observed.

Throwable.clone would allow a better solution, so especially if there
are any other use cases for it, I encourage you to pursue this.

-Doug






More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list