RFR:JDK-8148849:Truncating Duration
nadeesh tv
nadeesh.tv at oracle.com
Mon Apr 4 11:28:10 UTC 2016
Hi,
I need one more review for this change
Regards,
Nadeesh
On 3/30/2016 7:03 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Yes, that looks OK now.
> thanks
> Stephen
>
>
> On 30 March 2016 at 12:25, nadeesh tv <nadeesh.tv at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Thanks for the comments.
>> Please see the updated webrev
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.01/
>>
>> Made a change in unit == ChronoUnit.SECONDS also
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nadeesh TV
>>
>>
>> On 3/29/2016 6:10 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>> We're almost there, but looking at the tests, it looks like the
>>> behaviour is wrong:
>>>
>>> The intended behaviour is that
>>> -20.5mins (minus 20 minutes 30 secs) should truncate to -20mins
>>> -2.1secs truncate to -2secs
>>>
>>> Note that the truncation is different to Instant here.
>>> An Instant truncates towards the far past - like RoundingMode.FLOOR
>>> A Duration truncates towards the zero - like RoundingMode.DOWN
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 March 2016 at 13:18, nadeesh tv <nadeesh.tv at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Bug Id : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8148849
>>>>
>>>> Enhanced Duration by adding public Duration truncatedTo(TemporalUnit
>>>> unit)
>>>>
>>>> Please http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntv/8148849/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> Nadeesh TV
>>>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Nadeesh TV
>>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Nadeesh TV
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list