RFR(XXS): 8149519: Investigate implementation of java.specification.version

[Volker Simonis]

Yes, this was the version I've looked to as well. Thanks for pointing this out.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> I think the jdk9 docs have moved (again, grrrr - I complain about this
> sort of thing every release) and so a google search for "package class
> se 9" only finds the old one +104 at
> http://download.java.net/jdk9/docs/api/java/lang/Package.html
> Why can't there be a redirect instead of leaving the old docs in place?
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 27/04/2016 10:54, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>
>>> :
>>> Thanks for the clarification. As far as I can see, this updated
>>> javadoc is still only in the jigsaw repo so I didn't read it before.
>>>
>> It's in JDK 9 since jdk-9+111. I just checked the online/browsable docs [1]
>> and it's there.
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>> [1] http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/index.html