RFR: 8164669: Lazier initialization of java.time

[Claes Redestad]

On 2016-08-23 22:52, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> This looks fine to me.

Thanks for the review!

> I suspect that we could hand write a parser to
> avoid the regex, but this probably suffices.
> Stephen

Right, this is admittedly a bit of a hack. Maybe it would be possible
to carefully use/extend DateTimeFormatter to deal with Durations and
Periods?

/Claes

>
> On 23 August 2016 at 19:49, Claes Redestad <claes.redestad at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this tiny cleanup reduces number of loaded classes from a minimal test
>> touching java.time.ZoneId.systemDefault() by ~40, by virtue of avoiding
>> pulling in regex and some internal Calendar-related classes.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164669
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8164669/webrev.01/
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> /Claes