RFR (JAXP) JDK-8087303 LSSerializer pretty print does not work anymore and JDK-8114834 LSSerializerImpl always serializes an entity reference node to" &entityName; " even if "entities" property is false
Frank Yuan
frank.yuan at oracle.com
Thu Dec 15 10:52:01 UTC 2016
Hi Joe
Thank you very much for your comments!
I have made a new webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8087303_8114834/webrev.01/ as your suggestions, please check.
Thanks
Frank
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Wang [mailto:huizhe.wang at oracle.com]
> Subject: Re: RFR (JAXP) JDK-8087303 LSSerializer pretty print does not work anymore and JDK-8114834 LSSerializerImpl always
serializes an
> entity reference node to" &entityName;" even if "entities" property is false
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> Thanks for the diligent work! I think we've made a great improvement
> over the PrettyPrint (tremendous ;-) )
>
> Could you look into extracting the XML literal strings in the test into
> plain files (similar to the other 'gold' files)? What I'm hoping to see
> is that they'd look easily prettier in a text editor, and for that
> matter, the original xml files were a mess.
>
> The tests set PrettyPrint, and by default for html. It would be good to
> test the cases when it's turned off, that would help verify the
> non-pretty format was not changed.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> On 12/13/16, 6:55 AM, Frank Yuan wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8087303_8114834/webrev.00/ is for JDK-8087303 and JDK-8114834, I have to combine the
fix
> > because there is some interaction between them.
> > Bugs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087303 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8114834
> >
> > Besides fixed some issues in xml serializer, I made the following changes in this patch:
> > 1. refined the handling for whitespace text
> > 2. added support for xml:space attribute
> > 3. changed the default indentation to 4
> > 4. refined the handling for HTML block element and inline element
> >
> > Would you like to have a look at this review?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list