[DING] Re: [PING] Potential infinite waiting at JMXConnection#createConnection
KUBOTA Yuji
kubota.yuji at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 17:27:09 UTC 2016
Hi all,
Could someone please review and sponsor this fix ?
I write the details of this issue again. Please review it.
=Problem=
Potential infinite waiting at TCPChannel#createConnection.
This method flushes the DataOutputStream without the socket
timeout settings when choose stream protocol [1]. If connection lost
or the destination server do not return response during the flush,
this method wait forever because the timeout settings is set the
default value of SO_TIMEOUT, i.e., infinite.
[1]: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/file/7adef1c3afd5/src/java.rmi/share/classes/sun/rmi/transport/tcp/TCPChannel.java#l227
I think this issue is rarely, however serious.
=Reproduce=
I write a test program to reproduce. You can reproduce by the below.
* hg clone http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/ykubota/fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory/
* cd fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory; mvn package
* setting "stop_time" at debugcontrol.properties if you need.
* java -cp .:target/debugcontrol-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar debugcontrol.DebugController
This program keep to wait at TCPChannel#createConnection due to
this issue. After "debugcontroltest.stop_time" ms, this program release
the waiting by sending quit to jdb which is stopping the destination
server. Finally, return 2.
=Solution=
Set timeout by using property-configured value:
sun.rmi.transport.tcp.responseTimeout.
My patch is below.
http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/ykubota/fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory/file/e31044f0804f/jdk9.patch
If you run the test program with modified JDK9 by my patch, the test
program will get java.net.SocketTimeoutException after the connection
timeout happen, then return 0.
Thanks,
Yuji.
2016-01-13 23:31 GMT+09:00 KUBOTA Yuji <kubota.yuji at gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Can somebody please review and sponsor this fix ?
>
> Thanks,
> Yuji
>
> 2016-01-05 17:56 GMT+09:00 KUBOTA Yuji <kubota.yuji at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Jaroslav and core-libs-dev,
>>
>> Thank Jaroslav for your kindness!
>>
>> For core-libs-dev members, links the information about this issue.
>>
>> * details of problem
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2015-April/002152.html
>>
>> * patch
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/ykubota/fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory/file/e31044f0804f/jdk9.patch
>>
>> * testcase for reproduce
>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/ykubota/fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory/file/e31044f0804f/testProgram
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2015-December/018415.html
>>
>> Could you please review these reports?
>> Hope this patch helps to community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yuji
>>
>> 2016-01-04 23:51 GMT+09:00 Jaroslav Bachorik <jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com>:
>>> Hi Yuji,
>>>
>>> On 4.1.2016 15:14, KUBOTA Yuji wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please review this patch?
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for the long delay. Shanliang has not been present for some time and
>>> probably this slipped the attention of the others.
>>>
>>> However, core-libs mailing list might be more appropriate place to review
>>> this change since you are dealing with s.r.t.t.TCPChannel
>>> (http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/ykubota/fixLoopAtJMXConnectorFactory/file/e31044f0804f/jdk9.patch)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> -JB-
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list