ClassFileTransformer does not apply to anonymous classes

[Andrew Dinn]

On 26/01/16 08:39, Rafael Winterhalter wrote:
> Another note on this subject: I found that applying a
> reretransformation on a lambda expression's class does not provide the
> original class file to the retransformer but the class file that
> resulted from a previous retransformation. (If a lambda class is
> retransformed several times.) This is different to "normal" classes
> where the original class file is provided.

I think it is also /clearly wrong/ since it makes it at very least
difficult and perhaps, depending on circumstances, impossible for a
transformer to restore the original bytecode.

regards,


Andrew Dinn
-----------