JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8161567: Mark java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/FJExceptionTableLeak.java as intermittently failing

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Hello,

While the underlying issues are being investigated, I think it is 
worthwhile to tag the test as intermittently failing to aid those having 
to QA any if its failures.

Cheers,

-Joe

On 7/18/2016 4:56 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 19/07/2016 12:38 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> Like I always say, I'm unhappy with the increased memory requirements.
>> Java programs that used to run in 4m now need more than 8m. Hotspot 
>> should
>> be fixed!
>
> I've updated the comments in
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151158
>
> I agree further investigation is needed in this case.
>
>> If this is dependent on the particular GC, maybe there's a way to 
>> require
>> not having that gc.
>
> GC algorithm itself should not be causing OOME.
>
> David
> -----
>
>> I see:
>>
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/LowMemoryTest2.sh:28:# @requires
>> vm.gc=="null"
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/PendingAllGC.sh:29:# @requires
>> vm.gc=="null"
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/MemoryManagementConcMarkSweepGC.sh:29:# 
>>
>> @requires vm.gc=="ConcMarkSweep" | vm.gc=="null"
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/MemoryTestAllGC.sh:29:# @requires
>> vm.gc=="Parallel" | vm.gc=="null"
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/MemoryManagementParallelGC.sh:29:#
>> @requires vm.gc=="Parallel" | vm.gc=="null"
>> ./java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/MemoryManagementSerialGC.sh:29:#
>> @requires vm.gc=="Serial" | vm.gc=="null"
>>
>> Maybe we can make this test pass in a similar way.
>>
>> Bug reports should be clearer about which VM flags actually cause the
>> failure.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Amy Lu <amy.lu at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/FJExceptionTableLeak.java
>>>
>>> Test was ever fixed in JDK-8144990, but still failing intermittently as
>>> reported in JDK-8151158.
>>>
>>> This patch is to add back @key intermittent to the test. (and keep 
>>> it in
>>> tier2 till issue resolved.)
>>> Please review.
>>>
>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161567
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8161567/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amy
>>>
>>> --- old/test/java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/FJExceptionTableLeak.java
>>> 2016-07-18 14:37:25.000000000 +0800
>>> +++ new/test/java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/FJExceptionTableLeak.java
>>> 2016-07-18 14:37:25.000000000 +0800
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>>>   * @test
>>>   * @author Doug Lea
>>>   * @bug 8004138
>>> + * @key intermittent
>>>   * @summary Check if ForkJoinPool table leaks thrown exceptions.
>>>   * @run main/othervm -Xmx8m
>>> -Djava.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.common.parallelism=4
>>> FJExceptionTableLeak
>>>   */
>>>
>>>
>>>