JDK 9 RFR of 8161402: Provide a javadoc description for java.prefs module

Tue Jul 19 22:06:14 UTC 2016

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Lance Andersen <lance.andersen at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, now I am confused :-)
> 
> Earlier in the thread, it was raised that it would be more efficient to have 1 bug and 1 owner.  Your reply seemed to agree to that, but now it looks like you are rethinking this?
> 
> The module descriptions seemed to all be something similar to 
> 
> 	The {@code java.XXX} module defines and exports the XXX API
> 
> At least that is what was being proposed on the thread for] Brian’s changes

In that case it is of course possible to do by a single person. If somebody wants to provide a thorough description, he or she will have to create another bug.

Shura

> 
> Best
> Lance
>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 5:52 PM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I was originally assuming that different engineers would be responsible for providing descriptions for different modules … if to merge all that into one bug, a single person will either have to come up with everything himself/herself or go around and ask for all the description in the e-mail. Should we instead create an umbrella issue which the sub-tasks suggesting descriptions in the comments or something similar?
>> 
>> Shura
>> 
>>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Lance Andersen <lance.andersen at oracle.com <mailto:lance.andersen at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Brian and I exchanged email off-line.  I will take ownership of this and grab the existing bugs Wed.
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Lance
>>>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Brian Burkhalter <brian.burkhalter at oracle.com <mailto:brian.burkhalter at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 8:20 AM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <alexandre.iline at oracle.com <mailto:alexandre.iline at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com <mailto:Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I agree, I think we should close the bulk of these issues and replace with one issue.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Shura - are you okay if we close all the issues that you created and replace them with one?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Absolutely.
>>>> 
>>>> If no one else wants to do it I can take this task of collapsing the issues, etc. It should comprise also reexamining the verbiage already in place (java.base, java.desktop, etc.).
>>>> 
>>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>> Oracle Java Engineering 
>>> 1 Network Drive 
>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering 
> 1 Network Drive 
> Burlington, MA 01803
> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
> 
> 
> 