RFR (JAXP): 8162598 XSLTC transformer swallows empty namespace declaration which is needed to undeclare default namespace

Joe Wang huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Fri Jul 29 20:33:57 UTC 2016


Hi Christoph,

All tests passed. Please add a note to the test on what's expected, or 
some javadoc to the method checkNodeNS8162598.

Best,
Joe

On 7/29/16, 7:55 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> here is the webrev after merging: 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8162598.2/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eclanger/webrevs/8162598.2/>
>
> Let me know when you have done your tests -- then I'll push it.
>
> @Daniel: Thanks for your help regarding Stack<?>. You were right, I 
> could remove that "<?>".
>
> Thanks & Best regards
>
> Christoph
>
> *From:*huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.wang at oracle.com]
> *Sent:* Freitag, 29. Juli 2016 08:04
> *To:* Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; Daniel Fuchs 
> <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com>
> *Cc:* core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: RFR (JAXP): 8162598 XSLTC transformer swallows empty 
> namespace declaration which is needed to undeclare default namespace
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 7/28/2016 6:10 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     please review my change for the XSLT namespace issue.
>
>     Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8162598.1/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eclanger/webrevs/8162598.1/>
>
>     Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162598
>
>     The issue has already been discussed in this thread:
>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-July/042525.html
>
>     Apart from the real fix in LiteralElement.java, method
>     translate(), I've done some further cleanups in a few places.
>     @Joe: The cleanups collide with some places of your proposed
>     change for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158084 where
>     we'd like to do the same things. So we'll have to synchronize on
>     pushing.
>
>
> My patch has just pushed. Could you merge the changes and re-generate 
> webrev?  The change looks to be sensitive. I'll build and run all 
> other tests for you.
>
> Best,
> Joe
>
>
>     I've also enhanced the test case "TransformerTest" and added a
>     method which does a regression test for the bug reported.
>
>     Thanks in advance for reviewing.
>
>     Best regards
>
>     Christoph
>


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list