RFR 8159245: Loggers created by system classes are not initialized correctly when configured programmatically from application code.
Daniel Fuchs
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Tue Jun 21 18:04:33 UTC 2016
On 21/06/16 17:01, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand this scenario.
>> ConfigurationData should remain as simple as possible.
>> Logger.getLogger() / LogManager.demandSystemLogger() will never return
>> a logger before it has been configured.
>> When we're merging the configuration data the system logger has
>> not been configured yet. Level etc are already volatile in Logger and
>> we should not introduce any new synchronization there.
>
> This is the scenario I was thinking about - would this ever happen?
>
> T1 is creating a system logger named “foo” and calling this.importConfg(other) at line 462 after setLevel(otherLevel) is done.
>
> this is the system logger “foo” and other is the user-created logger “foo”.
>
> T2 is calling other.setLevel(newLevel) on user-created logger “foo”.
I see. Let me think on that one.
cheers,
-- daniel
>
> Mandy
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list